Google Drive: Have Cloud Drives Lost Their Way?

Comments are closed


With this week’s introduction of Google Drive,   the conversation about “cloud drives”  has significantly increased amongst the tech community…  But have we lost a bit of focus on what a cloud drive is ?

To me,   and granted, I might not be in the majority here, there is a simple definition:

To be able to securely store and retrieve files (of any type) on the Internet (cloud) , and be able to access them from a device using the device’s standard file system (drive). 

Any other characteristics and features are additional functions (bells and whistles) that should be able to enable/disable at will.

Please do not get me wrong.   I *love*  DropboxSkyDrive, Egnyte and use them all daily.   I was anxiously waiting for Google Drive I am sure I will be using as well, but,  it seems like none of these services hit on the basic definition of what a cloud drive is intended to be.    To me they are more file synchronization  tools and not really cloud drives…

It is so puzzling!  I am no developer, but it seems like it would not be a significant  programing challenge to enable this.  I know, this last comment, would probably lead you to thing “what a complainer”, but let me just say: Perhaps, but opinions and feedback drive product improvements right? Winking smile


Let me explain a bit more detail:

Background: Like most of us (well maybe not “most”)  I use a desktop, a laptop, a thin client device, a table device and have several virtual machines that I use for one purpose or another (work/ test /learn / play) daily.

Goal / Desire 1:   I want to make my file library available to all of *my* devices.


  Pros Cons
Web-based access
products like:
(so many others!)
No additional space required on device
Ability to share files private/public + user/group
connectivity required
login needed
Not readily available
File Synchronization
products like:
Google Drive
Available web interface
Maps to a system level drive
Library available offline
Ability to share files private/public + user/group
Needs the disk space for sync entire library
Files replicated across devices
Drive map to cloud storage
products like:

maps a network based drive to a local drive

No additional space required on device

Always on connectivity required
permission management


Now let’s go one step forward:

Goal / Desire 2: I want to make parts of my file library available to other people/groups some public others privately.


Understandably, Of the above ones, today, web-based and file-sync are the best options.


There are two features which I think are driving the development of the current set of popular products, and thus the state of where we are.  they are:

  1. off-line availability
  2. User and group permissions.

What about the ability to securely map a drive to “the network”  and use it / go with it?  (a true cloud drive in my opinion)  — There has been multiple attempts to doing this over the years. and even a standard (webDAV) was created for it, but unfortunately nothing “really popular” – in Unix (and Mac) you can use native commands to map a drive.   Several applications are available which have different features and approaches including:


Product Brief Description
Gladinet Cloud Desktop This product mounts any number of cloud storage, (e.g. SkyDrive, Google Picasa, Google Docs, Amazon S3) as local folders  It is about $50bucks, but well worth it…Unfortunately, only available for Windows. 
TntDrive It allows me to mount Amazon S3 Bucket as a Windows Drive. This is a favorite of mine as it covers 95% of the Goal #1 above. Only available as a Windows client.
WebDrive & GroupDrive both products by SRT, it  allows you create a virtual drive that points to an ftp site (webDrive) or a GroupDrive Server. They now offer hosted version at

[Side bar:  Licensing on the above products can get expensive, as they are all based on a per device bases.  Some offer free versions, but not all – or limited in capabilities)

Summary / Conclusion:

Will continue to use my TNTDrive / AmazonS3 as primary personal cloud drive and DropBox for sharing.  The others will continue to serve as secondary online tools.

I must confess, I was really hoping Google Drive would be different (adding links to my Google Docs is just not that compelling) .  I am still hoping community feedback would drive 

If just one of them would set a folder property that would set that folder to “cloud-only” that would be nice!   (I know easier said than done)



Further Reading on this topic:

Comments are closed.