The Cost of 460 Million Tokens – Understanding Tokens, Token Types
Part of: AI Learning Series Here
Quick Links: Resources for Learning AI | Keep up with AI | List of AI Tools
Subscribe to JorgeTechBits newsletter
AI Disclaimer I love exploring new technology, and that includes using AI to help with research and editing! My digital “team” includes tools like Google Gemini, Notebook LM, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity.ai, Claude.ai, and others as needed. They help me gather insights and polish content—so you get the best, most up-to-date information possible.
I written a few posts about tokens in the past, but as a follow up to my post: LLM Usage Stats on My Development Spree where I spent about $120 during a 45 day period to code using Kilo Code I got curious and dove a little bit more into what the cost of what I used over the period of time would have been have I not been on any kind of plan … Consuming 460 million tokens in a month might sound abstract, but it often means thousands of dollars in API spend depending on which model and provider you choose. Running AI at scale can get expensive fast, so there has to be an ROI
This post explains what tokens are, how different token types map across providers, and what it would roughly cost to use 460 million tokens in a month on popular proprietary models used for coding and general reasoning (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI).
What Is a Token?
A token is a unit of text processed by a model. It can be a word, part of a word, punctuation, or even whitespace. Roughly, one token is about 3–4 characters of English text, but this varies by language and content type.
All major LLM providers bill usage based on token counts rather than time or number of requests.
The Token Types You Actually Pay For
Although terminology differs across providers, there are only two token categories you are directly billed for.
Input tokens
Input tokens are everything you send to the model, including:
- Prompts and instructions
- System messages
- Conversation history
- Code snippets
- Retrieved documents in RAG systems
- Tool outputs that are fed back into the model
Input tokens are usually cheaper than output tokens.
Output tokens (also called response tokens)
Output tokens are everything the model sends back to you:
- Natural language responses
- Generated code
- JSON or other structured outputs
- Tool call arguments returned by the model
These tokens are typically more expensive than input tokens and often dominate overall cost in real systems, especially with verbose responses or agent-style workflows.
Internal or “reasoning” tokens
Models internally generate additional tokens while reasoning. These are sometimes described informally as “reasoning tokens” or “thinking tokens,” but they are not exposed and are not billed as a separate category.
Their cost is effectively baked into the per-token rates you see; you cannot directly control or observe them in standard APIs.
Token Terminology Mapping
Different dashboards, SDKs, and docs often use different names for the same concept. Here is how common terms for tokens sent from the model map to each other, plus how context size fits in conceptually:
| Term you see | Means | Context size (concept) |
|---|---|---|
| response tokens | output tokens | Counts against the model’s total context size/window |
| output tokens | output tokens | Counts against the model’s total context size/window |
| completion tokens | output tokens | Counts against the model’s total context size/window |
| generated tokens | output tokens | Counts against the model’s total context size/window |
| context window | context size | Maximum tokens the model can handle (input + output) |
If the model sends it back to you, it is an output token and it is billed accordingly. Context size tells you how many of those input and output tokens can fit into a single request.
How Providers Price Tokens
Most providers price input and output tokens separately, with output tokens several times more expensive than input tokens. Reasoning-oriented or premium models do not introduce a new billing category; they are simply priced higher per token.
For the estimates below, we assume:
- Text-only usage
- No fine-tuning
- No special enterprise discounts
- Roughly balanced usage: 50% input tokens, 50% output tokens
- Total monthly usage: 460 million tokens
- Assumed split: 230 million input tokens and 230 million output tokens
All numbers are approximate and intended for budgeting, not exact billing.
OpenAI Models
| Model name | explanation |
|---|---|
| GPT‑4o mini | – Input: about 0.15 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: about 0.60 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: ~128,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens (50/50 split): roughly 170–180 USD. |
| GPT‑5‑class models | – Input: about 1.25 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: about 10 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: ~400,000 to ~1,000,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens (50/50 split): roughly 2,500–2,700 USD. |
Anthropic (Claude) Models
| Model name | explanation |
|---|---|
| Claude Haiku | – Input: about 0.25–1.00 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: about 1.25–5.00 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: sized for practical coding and RAG workloads (shorter than Sonnet and Opus). – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens: roughly 300–1,400 USD depending on the exact tier. |
| Claude Sonnet | – Input: about 3 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: about 15 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: ~200,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens (50/50 split): roughly 4,100 USD. |
| Claude Opus | – Input: about 15 USD per 1M tokens in older pricing bands (with some newer variants somewhat cheaper). – Output: about 75 USD per 1M tokens in older schedules. – Context size: ~200,000 tokens, with extended tiers reaching up to ~1,000,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens: on the order of 20,000 USD or more. |
Google Gemini Models
| Model name | explanation |
|---|---|
| Gemini Flash | – Economy-tier model optimized for speed and high-volume workloads. – Input: about 0.30 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: about 2–3 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: ~1,000,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens (50/50 split): roughly 600–700 USD. |
| Gemini Pro | – Higher-end tier designed for more complex reasoning, coding, and richer workloads. – Input: about 1.5–2.5 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: about 10–15 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: ~1,000,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens (50/50 split): roughly 3,000–3,500 USD. |
xAI Grok Models
| Model name | explanation |
|---|---|
| Grok | – Mid-range, coding-capable and reasoning-focused model. – Input: around 3 USD per 1M tokens. – Output: around 15 USD per 1M tokens. – Context size: ~256,000 tokens. – Estimated monthly cost for 460M tokens (50/50 split): roughly 4,100 USD. |
Summary Table (Approximate Monthly Cost for 460M Tokens, 50/50 Split)
| Provider / Model | Approx. monthly cost for 460M tokens |
|---|---|
| OpenAI GPT‑4o mini | ~170 USD |
| OpenAI GPT‑5‑class models | ~2,600 USD |
| Google Gemini Flash | ~650 USD |
| Google Gemini Pro | ~3,200 USD |
| Anthropic Claude Sonnet | ~4,100 USD |
| xAI Grok | ~4,100 USD |
| Anthropic Claude Opus | ~20,000+ USD |
How to Estimate Your Own Monthly Cost
Once you understand how providers price input and output tokens, the next step is to estimate what your own workloads will cost. The goal is not perfect precision, but a reasonable range that informs model and architecture choices.
Side note: My AI coding assistant and I developed the RAG ChatBot Operating Cost Calculator which may be useful for you!
| Step | Details |
|---|---|
| Decide on monthly token volume | – Start from rough usage: – Requests per month × average input tokens per request. – Requests per month × average output tokens per request. |
| Split tokens into input vs. output | – If you do not have logs yet, assume a 50/50 split between input and output. – Once you have telemetry, replace that with real averages from production. |
| Apply per‑million token prices | – For each model: – Input cost = (monthly input tokens ÷ 1,000,000) × input price per 1M. – Output cost = (monthly output tokens ÷ 1,000,000) × output price per 1M. – Total monthly model cost = input cost + output cost. |
| Add a safety margin | – Add 10–30% on top to cover: – Traffic spikes and seasonality. – Occasional long conversations or documents. – Retries, tool failures, or debugging sessions. |
How to Reduce Your Token Spend
Once you have a ballpark estimate of your costs, you can start optimizing how you use tokens without sacrificing too much quality. Small, careful changes to prompts, routing, and retrieval patterns often deliver outsized savings.
| Strategy | Details |
|---|---|
| Control output length | – Use clear style and length guidance such as “answer in 3–5 bullet points,” “limit to two short paragraphs,” or “return only JSON.” – Set sensible max_tokens (or equivalent) instead of leaving it unlimited. |
| Trim and structure prompts | – Avoid pasting entire documents or full transcripts when only a small part is relevant. – Summarize older conversation history into a short recap instead of sending every prior message. – Remove boilerplate or repeated instructions from prompts where possible. |
| Use the smallest model that works | – Route simple tasks (classification, extraction, formatting, basic Q&A) to cheaper models. – Reserve premium models for advanced reasoning, long context, or complex tool use. |
| Optimize retrieval instead of stuffing context | – In RAG systems, retrieve only the top‑K most relevant chunks, not full files. – Tune chunk size and retrieval thresholds to send fewer, more relevant tokens per request. |
| Monitor token usage per feature | – Track tokens per request, per user, and per feature or endpoint. – Use these metrics to identify where prompt changes, truncation, or model downgrades deliver the biggest savings. |
Context Size: Power and Tradeoffs
Context size is a major differentiator between modern LLMs and directly affects what kinds of problems they can solve. Larger windows unlock richer use cases, but they also make it easier to overspend by sending more information than you actually need.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| What large context enables | – Handle longer documents in a single request. – Keep more conversation history active. – Support more complex multi‑tool and multi‑step agent workflows. |
| The main tradeoff | – Large context windows make it tempting to over‑stuff prompts. – Extra tokens increase cost and can sometimes introduce noise instead of improving quality. |
| Good usage patterns | – Use summarization to compress long histories and documents before sending them. – Retrieve only the most relevant pieces of information per call instead of “everything.” – Treat context space as a scarce resource, even when the maximum window is very large. |
Some notes to remembers:
- Only input tokens and output (response) tokens are billed; “reasoning” tokens are not a separate billing line item.
- Output tokens are usually the largest cost driver, especially for coding, verbose answers, and agent workflows.
- Context size (context window) determines how much text you can fit into a single request (input plus output) and directly affects how much state your application can keep “in view” at once.
- Choosing the right model tier often matters more than minor prompt optimizations when operating at hundreds of millions of tokens per month.