Selecting the Right AI Model for Your Needs (2025 Guide)

Part of: AI Learning Series Here
Subscribe to JorgeTechBits newsletter
The AI landscape is incredibly dynamic, with new versions and capabilities being released constantly. Did you know that over 80% of companies are integrating AI into their processes to stay competitive? Selecting the right AI model is not about finding a single “best” option, but rather about matching the right model—or combination of models—to the specific tasks and challenges you face.
AI applications are an integration of multiple components working together (see my original blog here), including trained AI models, data sources (structured and unstructured), APIs, and software systems that enable seamless data exchange and real-time interaction across platforms. This integration allows AI to access diverse data types, perform complex reasoning, and automate actions within business workflows, making AI solutions scalable, interoperable, and effective across different use cases.
Different AI models excel in different areas, such as language understanding, image processing, coding, or reasoning, and many real-world applications benefit from leveraging multiple models together to maximize effectiveness.
Choosing an ill-fitting model can lead to wasted resources, subpar performance, and missed opportunities, while the right model(s) can unlock transformative business impact and innovation. Understanding the strengths, trade-offs, and ideal use cases for each model ensures you get the best results for your unique needs. Whether you require advanced reasoning, multimodal processing, cost efficiency, or specialized safety features, staying informed and experimenting with different models is key to maintaining a competitive edge and maximizing return on investment.
Note: Integrating new AI models into your workflows involves ongoing stability assessment, rigorous testing, and adaptation. As models evolve rapidly, ensuring consistent performance and reliability requires dedicated time and effort to validate outputs, manage risks, and optimize deployment strategies.
Why Model Selection Matters
With the rapid evolution of AI, selecting the appropriate model has never been more important. Each model has its strengths tailored to specific tasks. Below is a list of the top prominent AI models as of late May 2025, focusing on general-purpose and widely discussed models, their primary target uses, and modalities.
Some Definitions First
- Modalities refer to the types of data that an AI model can natively process and/or generate. Common data modalities include text, images, audio, and video. A model’s modality determines the kinds of inputs it can understand and the outputs it can produce. For example, a text-only model processes and generates language, while a multimodal model can handle combinations such as text plus images or video. Understanding modalities is crucial because different data types require different processing architectures and enable different applications.
- Target Use describes the most common or noteworthy applications and tasks for which a model is designed or excels. This includes the model’s strengths and typical scenarios where it performs best, such as natural language understanding, code generation, image captioning, real-time conversational AI, or scientific data analysis. Knowing a model’s target use helps match it to specific business or research needs.
- Parameters are the numerical values within a model that are learned during training and determine the model’s behavior and capacity. They represent the internal weights of the neural network. Generally, larger models with more parameters have greater capacity to learn complex patterns and generate more nuanced outputs but require more computational resources. Parameter counts are often used as a rough indicator of model size and potential capability, though efficiency and architecture also matter.
- Open vs. Proprietary refers to whether a model’s code, architecture, and weights are publicly available (open) or restricted (proprietary). Choosing between open and proprietary models involves trade-offs around control, customization, cost, and support.
- Open models allow researchers and developers to inspect, modify, fine-tune, and deploy the model freely, fostering transparency and innovation. Examples include Meta’s Llama series and DeepSeek models.
- Proprietary models are controlled by companies that restrict access to the model internals, often providing access only via APIs or paid subscriptions. Examples include OpenAI’s GPT-4o and Anthropic’s Claude series.
Choosing the Right Model for Your Task
Selecting the ideal AI model is less about finding a single “best” model and more about identifying the right model—or combination of models—for the specific tasks you have. Different AI models excel at different capabilities, such as language understanding, image recognition, coding, or reasoning, and no one model can perfectly handle every job.
Depending on your application, leveraging multiple specialized models in tandem can provide greater accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility than relying on a single model alone.
Below you will find some key questions I have found useful to help clarify the project needs, evaluate trade-offs, and design an AI solution tailored to your unique requirements.
By asking these questions, you can better understand your priorities and constraints, guiding you toward the AI model or combination of models best suited to your goals. Experimentation and iterative evaluation with real-world data remain essential to optimizing your AI solutions in a rapidly evolving landscape.
- What is your core need or primary goal?
- Are you looking for a versatile model with strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities?
- Do you need to work extensively with diverse media types or very long documents?
- Is safety, ethical response, or nuanced long-form writing a priority?
- Will your tasks involve complex coding or domain-specific knowledge?
- What are your context window requirements?
- How large are the inputs you need to process (e.g., entire books, long codebases, multi-document contexts)?
- Do you require models that can handle very long sequences without losing context?
- How important are cost and speed for your use case?
- Are you targeting high-volume, low-latency applications where speed and cost-efficiency are critical?
- Would you prioritize premium quality and complexity even if it means higher costs?
- What is your budget for model usage, including licensing and compute resources?
- What data modalities do you need to support?
- Will your tasks involve only text, or do you need multimodal capabilities (images, audio, video)?
- How important is native multimodality versus text-only processing?
- How customizable does the model need to be?
- Do you require fine-tuning or domain adaptation capabilities?
- Would you benefit from open-source models that allow modification and self-hosting?
- What are your latency and deployment constraints?
- Is real-time response critical for your application?
- Are there infrastructure or hardware limits that restrict model size or complexity?
- How will you evaluate model performance and quality?
- What benchmarks or metrics matter most (accuracy, fluency, relevance, context awareness)?
- How will you test the model with your specific prompts and data?
- Do you have resources to conduct ongoing evaluation and prompt engineering?
- What ethical and risk considerations apply?
- How important is bias mitigation and safe content generation?
- Does the model provider offer transparency about training data and risk management?
- Are there compliance or regulatory requirements your model must meet?
- How will you stay updated with evolving models?
- How frequently do you plan to review and potentially switch models as new versions emerge?
- What is your strategy for integrating new capabilities or retiring older models?
- Real-World Application Reflection
- How might combining multiple models leverage their unique strengths for different stages of your workflow?
- What trade-offs are acceptable between cost, speed, accuracy, and safety in your operational context?
- How will you balance innovation with stability to ensure consistent business value?
Prominent AI Models (as of late May 2025)
Model Name | Developer | Target Use (Key Strengths & Notable Features) | Modalities | Release Date |
GPT-4o | OpenAI | Flagship, general purpose; advanced reasoning, creative content generation (text, code, stories), real-time conversational AI, customer support, data analysis | Text, Image, Audio, Video (I/O) | 2024 Q4 |
GPT-4o Mini | OpenAI | Cost-efficient general purpose; high-volume text generation, quick summarization, low-latency chatbot interactions | Text, Image | 2024 Q4 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro | Flagship, natively multimodal; complex problem-solving, long-context window for enterprise applications | Text, Image, Audio, Video (I/O) | 2025 Q1 | |
Gemini 2.5 Flash | Fast, cost-efficient multimodal; real-time applications, quick data extraction | Text, Image, Audio, Video (I/O) | 2025 Q1 | |
Claude 4 Opus | Anthropic | Flagship, safety & advanced reasoning; multi-step reasoning, ethical guardrails, nuanced conversational AI | Text, Image (PDFs, charts, diagrams) | 2025 Q1 |
Claude 4 Sonnet | Anthropic | Balanced performance & cost; general-purpose text generation, summarization, Q&A, content moderation | Text, Image | 2025 Q1 |
Claude 3 Haiku | Anthropic | Fast & cost-efficient; high-volume real-time responses for simple Q&A and chatbot interactions | Text, Image | 2024 Q4 |
Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open-source multimodal flagship; native multimodality with early fusion, mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture, advanced reasoning, extended context window (up to 10M tokens), multilingual (200+ languages) | Text, Image, Video (natively multimodal) | 2025 Q2 |
Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open-source multimodal & efficient; MoE with 16 experts, fits on single H100 GPU, excels at summarization, coding, and reasoning | Text, Image (natively multimodal) | 2025 Q2 |
Llama 4 Behemoth | Meta | Most powerful Llama 4 model (still training); teacher model outperforming GPT-4.5 and others on STEM benchmarks | Text, Image, Video (natively multimodal) | 2025 Q2 (in progress) |
Llama 3 | Meta | Open-source general purpose; instruction following, code generation, creative writing | Text (primarily) | 2024 Q3 |
Mistral Large | Mistral AI | High-performance European LLM; complex reasoning, multilingual, strong data privacy | Text | 2023 Q4 |
Mistral Medium | Mistral AI | Balanced performance & cost; general-purpose text generation and summarization | Text | 2023 Q4 |
Mixtral 8x7B | Mistral AI | Open-source MoE; faster inference, strong multilingual capabilities | Text | 2024 Q1 |
DeepSeek V3 | DeepSeek AI | Open-source general-purpose multimodal model; excels in instruction following, coding, math, and multimodal reasoning; uses mixture-of-experts and latent attention for efficiency | Text, Image (I/O) | 2024 Q4 |
Janus-Pro 7B | DeepSeek AI | Unified multimodal model for text and image understanding and generation; excels in visual question answering, text-to-image generation, and multimodal reasoning; open-source with high benchmark scores surpassing DALL-E 3 | Text, Image (I/O) | 2025 Q1 |
Qwen 2.5 | Alibaba Cloud | Multilingual & general purpose; strong in Chinese and English, multimodal variants | Text, Image (VL variants) | 2024 Q4 |
Grok | xAI (Elon Musk) | Real-time news synthesis & unique conversational style; integrated with X (Twitter) | Text (web/social data focus) | 2024 Q4 |
Gemma | Open-source lightweight models; fine-tuning and smaller-scale applications | Text (some multimodal variants) | 2024 Q3 | |
Phi-4 Multimodal | Microsoft | Small, efficient & multimodal; strong on-device AI capabilities | Text, Image, Audio (integrated) | 2024 Q4 |
DALL-E 3 | OpenAI | Text-to-image generation; high-quality images from text prompts, used in graphic design and art | Image (output only) | 2024 Q4 |
Have questions ?
Please feel free to reach out if you have questions. Happy to answer anything I can.
I work with an amazing team of professionals at Dell Technologies Services.